THIS WEEK: Competition; Cuba; Tesla – Solar City; Selfless or Rational?Read more
THIS WEEK: Facebook Monopoly; Victoria’s Recovery; Florida Condo Collapse.Read more
THIS WEEK: Billionaire Tax Rates; Who “Misses” Trump; Post Post-Modern Art.Read more
Follow populyst to receive this weekly commentary in your inbox every Wednesday.
This week: Revolution!; Social Media Blows Up; Parler Silence.Read more
A weekly commentary on current events. Follow populyst to receive notification.
This week: Kamala Harris; Reducing competition; Gigantism.Read more
That means less cronyism and more competition.
“Inequality is not necessarily bad in itself: the key question is to decide whether it is justified.”____ Thomas Piketty in Capital in the Twenty-First Century.
Piketty’s words read like a premise that is only half right, followed by a problematic corollary. Reasonable people will agree that some inequality is not only “not necessarily bad” but also very desirable and very necessary in order to stimulate the economy’s entrepreneurial and innovative spirits. Further, if some inequality is desirable, how much is enough and how much is too much? And who gets to decide?
Clearly, there will never be a consensus on this. And it is not a satisfactory solution that the majority party would decide for the next four or eight or twelve years. The back and forth dominance of one party over the other would mean that any measures enacted to combat extreme inequality would at best amount to a feeble and erratic effort instead of a long-term cure, while the underlying problem gets larger with every electoral cycle.
To make things worse, both of the major parties in the United States are mistaken to ascribe inequality to an excess of capitalism. Democrats claim that growing inequality is the result of unbridled ‘wild west’ capitalism. And Republicans argue that it is a mostly acceptable byproduct of capitalism. But extreme inequality is in fact caused by insufficient competition. Given that competition is the lifeblood of capitalism, it follows that inequality is the result, not of capitalism, but of a lack of capitalism.